Thursday, January 15, 2009

Big labor urges court to invalidate Prop. 8

A coalition of more than 50 labor organizations representing more than two million Californians filed a friend-of-the-court brief Tuesday urging the state Supreme Court to overturn the voter-approved constitutional ban on same-sex marriage.

The labor groups' brief argues that "any change to the California Constitution that takes away fundamental rights or that divides citizens into suspect classes must be accomplished by a 'revision' of the Constitution, and not the simple 'amendment' employed in Proposition 8."

"If a simple majority of voters can take away one fundamental right, it can take away another," the brief states.

"We believe Prop. 8 is improper and it's immoral and it's also legally invalid," Art Pulaski, executive secretary-treasurer of the California Labor Federation AFL-CIO, told reporters Tuesday. "We have an interest not only in defending the rights of our members, but we have an interest in defending the constitution of California."

Agreed UHW-West President Sal Rosselli, "Us defending the right of gay people to marry, us defending this civil right is fundamentally important because ... there's a slippery slope and wealthy bigoted people could organize votes of the electorate to take away other civil rights."

Equality California executive director Geoff Kors said he believes "the leadership of labor in this brief is going to have a tremendous impact." Jenny Pizer, Lambda Legal senior counsel and Marriage Project Advertisementdirector, said the brief "is putting a special emphasis on how high the stakes are here for everybody in California."

The California Council of Churches and other faith organizations and leaders will file their own amicus brief Wednesday asking the court to invalidate Proposition 8. Others, including lawyers' groups and 44 state lawmakers, already have written similar pleas; conservative groups have urged the court to let Proposition 8 stand.

The California Supreme Court has set a fast-tracked briefing schedule, which should be completed this month, with oral arguments heard as soon as March.



  • Teranet urges rejection of $2 billion takeover bid
  • Prop. 8 enters legal long haul
  • PPIC poll shows big property rights concern but indecision on Props 98, 99


  • Teranet urges rejection of $2 billion takeover bid
  • Prop. 8 enters legal long haul
  • PPIC poll shows big property rights concern but indecision on Props 98, 99


  • Teranet urges rejection of $2 billion takeover bid
  • Prop. 8 enters legal long haul
  • PPIC poll shows big property rights concern but indecision on Props 98, 99
  • 0 comments: