Monday, October 6, 2008

Environmental groups react to Naval Weapons Station proposals

CONCORD — Environmental groups watching over Concord Naval Weapons Station reuse plans want the city to be more creative in its planning and to consider anything from high-rise buildings with hanging gardens to something akin to Golden Gate Park.

But city leaders have hesitated to get too specific, having just released two general proposals showing possible breakdowns of open space versus housing and commercial growth on the base's 5,028 inland acres. They say it is too early in the process to start naming detailed projects. That, they say, won't happen until well after the city, along with the public, picks a preferred blueprint in early 2009.

But environmental experts argue that some of the specifics — such as whether to put a mall on one spot, versus putting a bio-research center on the same spot — will determine how the area will feel, and what should be built where. This is the largest land use project the region has ever seen, they say, and needs to be done right.

"You have to incorporate some ideas early on; otherwise, you just end up planning the same kind of Mediterranean stucco strip malls we're used to seeing everywhere else," said Ron Brown, executive director of Save Mt. Diablo, a 37-year-old environmental advocacy organization in Contra Costa County.

"There are smart people out there who have great ideas, but I don't know that they've really been heard."

He referred specifically to the Community AdvertisementAdvisory Council, a citizen-led group charged with recommending a blueprint for the former base to the City Council.

The advisory council has operated for more than a year and put together the two proposals now on the table. Yet members just received information about environmental constraints on the land — spots hosting endangered species, for instance — in the past few days, Brown said.

"In our minds, that information should have been available to the CAC all along," said Seth Adams, director of land programs for Save Mt. Diablo. The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service can step in and reject these plans, Adams said, and having information early on matters.

At the same time, both Adams and Brown said they like the general look of both proposals on the table — one contains 73 percent open space, and the other contains 50 percent. Other groups, some of them part of the Community Coalition for a Sustainable Concord along with Save Mt. Diablo, have been asking for 80 percent open space.

Christina Wong of Greenbelt Alliance wants more assurances open space stays open permanently and that the entire development, whatever it is, is supported by public transportation.

She referred to an East Bay Regional Parks District proposal for the base, being considered by the city along with other public benefit-type proposals, and said the park district proposal should be incorporated into the plans now rather than later.

"The city has some development in spots that the parks district is incorporating into its plans, which is obviously in conflict," said Wong, adding the city and park district need to discuss that further.

Concord Mayor Bill Shinn said the city has indeed been listening to comments from the environmental community.

Early on, development was slated for south of Bailey Road, in an environmentally sensitive area, and organizations such as Greenbelt Alliance asked that it be removed from the plans. The city did that, Shinn said.

Shinn said he supports making any open space designations permanent.

"Legally, I'm not sure how much we can handcuff future councils, but I am very supportive of that idea," he said. "We want to make sure that what we say we want as open space stays (open)."

Planning is going well, Shinn said, but the process is evolving. "The elements that are being presented will move around. We may have a park right now being proposed for 120 acres, and maybe that goes to 200 later, and that's fine. The point is that the foundation is being laid."

Wong said that overall, her organization is happy with the changes the city has made, but said there's room for improvement.

Perhaps more pressing at the moment, Wong said, is a LAFCO meeting scheduled for 1:30 p.m. Wednesday regarding potential future development on the Pittsburg hillsides. Because those hills border the weapons station, decisions made about the hills are paramount, she said. The meeting will be at the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors chamber, 651 Pine St., Martinez.



  • Alberta attempts to balance growth, conservation in new land-use policy
  • Two plans for Concord naval station — only one will sail
  • Benicia’s Seeno project approaches key vote
  • Clayton candidates debate
  • 0 comments: